HF Field Strength Prediction for Short and Medium-Range Ionospheric Radiopaths B.G. Barabashov, M.M. Anishin, and L.P. Radio The method is described of evaluation of sky-wave field strength. The method provides a tool for planning and operation analysis of HF radio links ranging up to 6000 km. The special attention is given to short radiopaths. The method is implemented as a software package. The package allows: - to predict space-time distribution of ionization along an ionospheric radiopath, and adjust the distribution using current diagnostics data; - to determine the modal and ray structure of incoming field at the reception site, including lower, upper rays and complex trajectories, and expected number of rays (modes) and times of their relative delay; - for every ray (ordinary and extraordinary), to evaluate the following characteristics: elevation angles (launch and arrival), group delay, ionospheric absorption, space loss, Earth reflection loss, parameters of polarization ellipse for outgoing wave; - to evaluate total signal strength at the reception site, and compute effective voltage of signal at a receiver input; - to predict MUF, FOT, and LUF for a path; - based on specific propagation conditions, to make a selection of optimal antennas; - to predict areas of reliable reception, and depict the results on world map. Effectiveness of the method was experimentally tested for the most propagationally-complicated conditions – short-range paths in between 15 … 600 km. The experiment could be characterized as measuring average HF field strength with calibrated transmitter-receiver circuits. The experiment involved years of maximum and low solar activity. Furthermore, experimental variations were compared with the results of simulation modeling. At the same time, the possibility was estimated of using ITU-R (R.533-8) and ICEPAC packages for loss prediction at short paths. The results of experimental testing showed quite high accuracy of the proposed method. The rms error of prediction of effective values of HF field strength proved to be close to instrumental error of measuring equipment, current diagnostics data being involved. Meanwhile, ITU-R (R.533-8) and ICEPAC predictions for the same conditions were found to be in significant error.